Crush Khalistani movement. But with empathy, not hostility

Amritpal Singh, the Waris Punjap De chief and a Khalistani sympathiser, has been on the run for over two weeks now. He is accused of maintaining close contacts with the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), and attempting to raise a militia, including suicide bombers to create disorder in the country, as per intelligence reports.

The call for a separate Sikh state, which began in the wake of the fall of the British Empire, has been a difficult issue to deal with for India.

And rightly so.

It is crucial to recognize that separatist movements can be complex and multifaceted, with a range of political, social, and economic factors contributing to their emergence and persistence. It is also important to recognize that violence and repression are not always effective in addressing underlying grievances or achieving long-term stability.

That said, the Indian government believes that the Khalistani separatist movement poses a genuine national security threat and considers a range of measures to address the situation. While an overtly aggressive approach can backfire and lead to chaos and disorder, there are other more sustainable approaches the government could take and may be doing so already.

Dialogue and negotiation should always be the first tactic. Addressing the underlying grievances of separatist movements through peaceful dialogue and negotiation may be more effective than using force. This could involve reaching out to representatives of the Khalistani movement to better understand their concerns and explore potential solutions.

Use of law enforcement and intelligence is another line of attack. The government should continue to increase its effort when it comes to using law enforcement and intelligence measures to identify and disrupt any illegal activities associated with the Khalistani movement, such as weapons smuggling or terrorist attacks.

Attending to political and economic measures can be key. The government could also consider addressing some of the underlying political and economic grievances that may be fueling the separatist movement. This could involve devolving more power to local authorities, investing in economic development in the affected regions, or addressing discrimination or other social inequalities.

If none of the above works, military action must be taken. The government may decide that military action is necessary to suppress a separatist movement. This could involve deploying additional troops to the affected region, using airstrikes or other forms of targeted military force, or conducting counterinsurgency operations.

All of these approaches come with potential risks and trade-offs, and that any response to a separatist movement should be carefully considered and tailored to the specific circumstances. Additionally, any government response should also respect human rights and international law, including the rights of individuals to free expression, assembly, and association.

Read More Global News, Entertainment, National & More on News Hour